HPV Vaccine and Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among women in Abia State

Authors

  • C.I. Amuzie
  • U.K. Kalu
  • M.O. Izuka
  • A.P. Bassi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4314/jcmphc.v36i2.8

Keywords:

Cervical Cancer, HPV, Vaccine, Infection, Pap smear, Women

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, and it is associated with infection by the Human  Papillomavirus (HPV). There are effective interventions for the prevention of cervical cancer. However, the uptake of these interventions  by women in developing countries is poor. This study assessed the knowledge and practices of cervical cancer preventive measures and  uptake of HPV vaccines among women in Abia State.

Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study among women in Abia State. Multistage sampling was used to recruit 700 eligible  women and an ODK interviewerbased structured questionnaire was used to collect the information. Descriptive, bivariate, and  multivariate analyses were done using SPSS version 26. The level of significance was set at 5%.

Results: The mean age of the respondents  was 40.3 ± 9.9 years and the proportion of women with good knowledge of HPV infection and vaccine was 22.0% (95% CI:  18.9- 25.1). The uptake of Pap smear and HPV vaccine was 7% and 3%, respectively, while predictors of good knowledge for HPV infection  and vaccine included higher educational status (aOR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.73–3.71, p = 0.001), being currently married (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI:  0.18–0.54, p= 0.001) and divorced (aOR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.13–0.49, p=0.001).

Conclusion: Poor knowledge of HPV infection and vaccines,  and poor uptake of Pap smear and HPV vaccine were prevalent among the respondents. We recommend policymakers design health  education programmes to improve knowledge and preventive cervical cancer practices. 

Downloads

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

C.I. Amuzie, U.K. Kalu, M.O. Izuka, & A.P. Bassi. (2024). HPV Vaccine and Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among women in Abia State. Journal of Community Medicine & Primary Health Care, 36(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.4314/jcmphc.v36i2.8